Somez people think that governments should spend more money on sports facilities for top athletes. Others argue that this money should be spent on sports facilities for ordinary people. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
Many
people
claim that
athletes
an important
people
because they can bring honour to their
country
when they win the game so the
government
should focus on them and spend on
athletes
.
However
, it is just only a group of
people
but other
people
think that's
government
should support facilities for sport and other national in the
country
as well.
To begin
with, let's take a look at why numerous nations are conscious of sportsmen. As mentioned on top honour of clime is important for populations it can be soft power
also
.
Moreover
, it can make money from tourists and sponsors who want to invest in sports and it can make money for the
country
too.
For instance
, klick boxing many
people
stereotype that Thai
people
are experts in
this
game and many tourists come to learn in Thailand so it makes income for the
country
and boxing gyms. Alternatively, some
people
want
budget
distribution because every sector plays an important role in developing the
country
. It is not just
athletes
who can bring honour, and fame to the
country
or generate income for the
country
, but every sector can play a part in developing the
country
,
such
as public health, education or industry.
Therefore
, distributing the
budget
to many sectors will have a significant impact on the
country
.
Although
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
ordinary citizens
also
play a part in developing the
country
, the
budget
should be allocated to the welfare state to
further
develop the
country
.
To sum up
, in my opinion, all parts are important. It is the
government
's duty to manage the
budget
to be sufficient for developing the potential of the
people
in the
country
, not just
athletes
who should receive financial support to develop themselves. Because not everyone has the ability or interest in sports. If the
government
has to pay a high price to develop
athletes
only, it is not a worthwhile investment.
Submitted by np.napatping on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
Provide more specific and detailed examples to support your points, especially when discussing how budget distribution can impact sectors besides sports.
overall
Pay attention to grammar and sentence structure to make your argument clearer. Some sentences need better construction to fully convey your ideas.
coherence cohesion
Ensure that the introduction clearly outlines both sides of the argument before delving into details, to give the reader a comprehensive overview right from the start.
task achievement
The essay attempts to discuss both sides of the argument, which is a strong approach to this topic.
coherence cohesion
The conclusion effectively summarizes the main argument, reinforcing the narrative that the government should consider the broader needs of society.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: