Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Today some people see that the government should set an international

sports

event

as it gives benefit to the

country

.

However

, others disagree with

this

. I think international

sports

festivals provide both pros and cons to the

country

. The opinion will be discussed in the following paragraphs before the conclusion is reached.

First

of all, international

sports

events represent the economic growth within a

country

that is

the host. Countries that are able to host

this

kind of

event

means that their economics is good enough for them to have enough money to host the

event

.

For example

, the reason why Japan is able to set international

sports

events every year is because of its GDP

that is

very high due to the development of tourism for many years.

However

, the negative impact of arranging international

sports

events is that it does not develop citizens quality of life. International

sports

campaigns just only make a group of people who like playing and watching sport feel happy; the rest of them do not.

Therefore

, some people from a developing

country

argue that the government budget should be spent on other beneficial things,

such

as education, public health, transportation, etc.

instead

of setting an international

sports

event

, which costs a lot of money. In summary, there are both positive and negative impacts for a

country

to organize an international

sports

event

. On the one hand, it makes other countries see the prosperity of a

country

.

On the other hand

, it does not make the overall population feel happier, and it burdens the government's expenditure.