It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

As technology has developed,

people

can now travel to remote natural

areas

. While there are some advantages of

this

trend, I would argue that its disadvantages are more significant. On the one hand, visiting isolated natural places has some benefits.

Firstly

,

this

is a newer and more interesting type of travelling. Since going to other cities or countries has been too common for most

people

, it might be more exciting for them to explore new places

such

as the South Pole or the Amazon rainforest.

This

gives them valuable experiences and unforgettable memories.

Secondly

, when visiting remote

areas

,

people

, especially scientists, might acquire more knowledge about the natural habitat.

For example

, when coming to the North Pole, scientists can learn about the life of polar bears which live far away from humans.

On the other hand

, I believe there are great drawbacks

of

Change preposition

to

show examples

this

development. The

first

one is that travelling to remote natural

areas

can be risky if the travellers are not sufficiently prepared.

For instance

, the temperature at the South Pole is usually very low, which adversely affects

people

's health. Travelling to forests can

also

be dangerous as

people

have to face the risk of being attacked by wild animals.

Also

, since visiting isolated places often requires a large amount of investment in researching and ensuring the safety of travellers, the costs of travelling tend to be high.

Therefore

, it seems like only scientists and rich

people

can afford

this

activity, and

this

development is likely to benefit only a small group of individuals. In conclusion, I believe the disadvantages of

people

being able to travel to remote

areas

outweigh its advantages, and

this

is a negative development.