Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admissions to museums outweigh the disadvantages?

In the current era, Many

museums

charge entry fees whereas others are free of charge. Personally, Charging attendees for admission provides a wide range of benefits to individuals and

museums

. To start with, there are a large number of advantages, which bring significant improvement to the

museums

by charging individuals an entrance fee.

Firstly

, a main crucial benefit, which is the maintenance, preserve the lost value of the museum's valuable stuff which can be learned in the

next

era by following generations.

For example

, Some significant artefacts or stuff in some admission-free

museums

,which have no money for maintenance, are unable to maintain the value of those,

as a result

, those things in the

museums

look dusty and old.

Hence

, Investing in maintenance is reasonable for charging visitor entrance fees, which brings benefits not only for current visitors but

also

for the

next

generation.

In addition

, A sum of money from admission payment allows the places to improve facilities and increase new technology innovations in the digital age

such

as up-to-date security cameras, which can prevent robbery and secure visitors, in order to comfort and persuade attendees to visit the museum.

For instance

, Some

museums

in Bangkok, where playful technology innovations like video games have been added, attract a wide range of individual ages, especially children.

However

,

this

phenomenon solely affects low-income families.

Although

they are interested in learning culture and traditions from these places, they can not afford the prices of charge In conclusion, Charging entry payments provides many benefits to the museum, current individuals and

next

generations whereas it affects some populations. In my opinion, Payments should be reasonable in order to maintain visitors' interest and involvement.