Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss both views and your opinion.

To begin
with, in my opinion, both views are right. Neither party is right nor wrong. Some people may think that the environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally.
First
and foremost, both levels need to play their roles simultaneously. Why? Because
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
we live in one world which is belong to every homosapiens. Any pollution or environmental issues that occur in one country
subsequently
can affect others indeed. To illustrate, forest burning in Australia can bring the haze up to South East Asia. Meanwhile, any leaking oil or petroleum from the station in the open ocean can give rise to sea pollution involving many countries.
This
already happened in history.
Thus
, every country must act
accordingly
to save the planet at their national level so that the disastrous implications could be avoided not only, locally but internationally either.
For example
, World Health Organisation (WHO) does host a meeting discussing the matter globally. At the local level
then
, the representative will implement or improvise any steps to achieve the outlined target by WHO. WHO will offers help to certain nation whenever the need arise ,
for instance
, providing an advisor on steps to reduce hydrocarbon emission to the air and
subsequently
settling the environmental issue of a country via wholistic approaches.
This
evidence clearly shows that, the allies between an international organisation and a local state work hand in hand to handle the hazard.
On the other hand
, certain issues only can be tackled locally.
For instance
, sound or noise pollution. The authorities need to create a policy for the citizens. In
this
matter, no global platform requires, I suppose. In conclusion, handling environmental problems must be selective, depending on the degree or scale of the issues either require global touch or local touch. Practical is the key player here.
Submitted by sufianardi on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.

Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.

When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.

Linking words for giving examples:

  • for example
  • for instance
  • to illustrate this
  • to give a clear example
  • such as
  • namely
  • to illustrate
  • take, for example

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • international cooperation
  • sovereign rights
  • Paris Agreement
  • climate change
  • ocean pollution
  • collective measures
  • economic interests
  • political will
  • enforcement issues
  • free-riders
  • tailor-made solutions
  • transboundary pollution
  • resource constraints
  • global frameworks
  • national efforts
What to do next:
Look at other essays: