Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is suggested whether it is necessary to maintain public
museums
and art
galleries
. Some people argue that computers
have given us access to historical objects and artworks, so museums
are no longer needed. I strongly disagree with this
opinion, and I believe that traditional museums
and galleries
are irreplaceable and bring unique benefits.
Undoubtedly, appreciating artworks on a computer is no substitute for visiting museums
and galleries
, since computers
are not able to offer the same feelings and experiences to audiences as physical museums
and galleries
do. To state it more clearly, it is widely acknowledged that first
-hand observation enables better feeling and experiences to appreciate artworks, which means audiences have to come to museums
and galleries
, to gain an in-depth understanding of the background stories and author's intentions behind the works. For example
, I visited the Forbidden City Museum for seeing the national treasures, from where I appreciated those fine china from the texture and painting to understand what the past empire life looks like, and literally feel the changing times through the faded colours. However
, such
affluent experience can not be gained by simply searching via computers
.
Further
and more importantly, museums
and galleries
are still necessary for two main reasons. The first
reason is that museums
and art
galleries
offer many employment opportunities. It is known that many people work in art
galleries
, including management workers and art
creators. Hence
, they will lose their jobs if these venues are removed now. Another reason is that many museums
are landmarks in the cities. For example
, the British Museum in London and the Forbidden City Museum in Beijing, are landmarks and symbols that are essential to their cities. Therefore
, it is necessary to keep museums
and galleries
running for the above reasons.
In conclusion, based on the evidence analyzed, I believe public museums
and art
galleries
should not be closed simply because of the development of technology such
as computers
, as they could bring indispensable benefits as well as are necessary to the public.Submitted by kunli729 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site鈥檚 author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.