Some people think that the government should take care of disadvantaged people such as the unemployed and the homeless. Do you agree or disagree?

Disadvantaged

people

are the ones who have a physical disability or lack money. It is often argued that the

government

should allocate resources to help these vulnerable groups. I wholeheartedly support

this

notion and believe that

such

programs would have a significant impact on society and the development of the nation.

To begin

with, a good reason for the

government

to help needed

people

is that everyone has ups and downs in their lives and needs help at some point in their lives. The

government

is the only institution

that is

capable and has enough resources to help

this

group of

people

.

For instance

, most NGOs depend on donations and don’t have sufficient funds to help

people

on a large scale.

However

, governments have a large number of unutilized funds that can be used for

this

cause.

Furthermore

, when the

government

assumes the role, the public can be sure that all resources are distributed under strict supervision and management and reach the hands of those in need.

However

, there are some drawbacks to

this

approach.

Firstly

,

such

initiatives can be misused by the

people

in various ways.

For instance

,

government

aid can lead to unproductivity in workplaces as

people

are not afraid to lose their jobs because they can easily claim unemployment benefits from the

government

.

Moreover

, financial assistance is a short-term solution and can

also

cause a budget burden on the

government

,

thus

providing

people

with vocational training and employment opportunities could be a better way to solve

this

problem. In summary, it would appear that supporting disadvantaged

people

can cause a burden on the

government

.

However

,

this

drawback is greatly outweighed by the contributions of these

people

to our community.