Some believe that nuclear weapons benefit the world at large. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

While

weapons

were more simple in the past, nowadays, they have become so complex,

such

as nuclear

weapons

. Many believe

this

technology provides numerous advantages worldwide,

although

I totally disagree with

this

statement. On the one hand, advocates of atomic

weapons

may claim that it would give privileges for having a safer world.

This

is because not all the countries across the globe seek peace, and actually, some of them strive for more power and war.

Therefore

, having

such

powerful

weapons

will bring a safer environment internationally to all people due to the fact that these

weapons

hold those countries to initiate war - countries like North Korea and Iran to name a few.

On the other hand

, many people believe that atomic defence equipment is harmful.

sThe

Correct your spelling

the

she

detrimental

effect

Fix the agreement mistake

effects

show examples

of nuclear

weapons

are

Change the verb form

is

show examples

clearly known, which not only affects the environment but

also

it harms human health directly.

As a

result

Add a comma

,result

show examples

these

Correct determiner usage

this

show examples

equipment

have

Add a missing verb

do have

show examples

not any benefit to the world. An excellent example of these harms is Japan.

In addition

, these

weapons

are too dangerous to human existence as exploding only a few of them can lead to an irreversible disaster which might be

end

Add an article

the end

show examples

of the planet. In my opinion, these cutting-edge facilities do not have any positive side to the world but only danger. In conclusion, as the primary reasons mentioned, despite the fact that many say nuclear bombs are helpful, these

weapons

are accompanied by a significant threat to all people and our planet, so manufacturing of them should be stopped