Advances in technology and automation have reduced for manual labour. Therefore, working hours should be reduced. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The advent of technology has involved each facet of the contemporary world, including industrialisation. Automatic machines have mostly replaced human-operated work, precipitating the reduction of effective working

hours

. From my standpoint, I agree with

this

notion as cutting-edge technology lessens human workload by decreasing the

time

of manufacturing and enhancing the productivity rate.

To begin

with the production process, using conventional methods requires a longer

time

which can lead to longer working

hours

.

For example

, ceramics manufacture needs about 1 month in total, starting from clay, shaping, and heating, until they become well-produced items.

However

, in

this

modern era, the effect of machines is indispensable by reducing

time

by up to a third in ceramics production. Commencing from

this

fact, long working

hours

are not necessary for employees, and the decrease of

that is

a good idea.

Moreover

, by the descending of

hours

in a job, people could optimise their

time

to achieve their working goals, resulting in an increase in productivity. If the workers do not experience short working

hours

while

the process is effortlessly instant, they will get more demands causing a higher level of stress and a drop in productivity rate.

Therefore

, a shorter effective

time

in the workplace is needed to aim for a greater number of production. In conclusion, the state-of-the-art instruments in the offices or factories have brought numerous advantages which is why I completely agree if working

hours

can be cut. The companies necessitate hand in hand with the employees' community in order to achieve positive development for both parties, whether reducing working

time

is a must or not.