Trying to save endangered animal species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources. Do you agree or disagree?

There is a controversial statement heating a debate over the fact that protecting wildlife from the verge of extinction is a waste of precious resources. While

this

is valid to a certain extent, I consider myself an opponent of

this

argument. It is undoubted that there are many other aspects of life that need to be focused on

instead

of saving animals. To be specific, medical health and technology are the backbone industry that requires a considerable amount of investment.

For instance

, Africa is suffering from the effect of the pandemic due to the lack of money, which leads to the shortage of medical services and supplies.

Thus

, protecting endangered

species

is not the priority of governments because there are other important elements of life that need to be specialized in.

On the other hand

, there are several reasons why saving wildlife from the verge of extinction

worth

Add a missing verb

is worth

show examples

all the resources it requires.

Firstly

, animal

species

are

also

a valuable resource because they provide people with a wide range of useful supplies.

For example

, the hand of bears is an important medicine yet

this

specie is under a pressing threat.

Secondly

, it is undoubted that wildlife

enrich

Change the verb form

enriches

show examples

and contribute to the existence of the environment by their habits,

such

as squirrels and birds

help

Wrong verb form

helping

show examples

plant trees.

Lastly

, saving animal

species

is far more affordable because it mainly involves people's awareness than governments' funding.

Hence

, it is necessary to protect endangered animals due to the wonders it does for human beings. In conclusion, despite having many aspects that need specialization, I believe that we

also

need to focus on saving animal

species

from extinction.