The best way to solve world’s environmental problem is increase the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree and give your own opinion?

It is considered that increasing the price of fossil fuels is an effective way to handle environmental issues. I disagree with

this

given statement due to dissatisfaction among the individuals and the alternative

sources

which are

environment

friendly. To commence with, there are some demerits for solving the global problems to rise the cost of non-renewable

sources

. The most prominent one is that underprivileged people cannot afford the fuel to fulfil their needs. To explain it, it may detrimental effect on the financial growth due to the highest prices of coal they can not compete with fast pace world.

For example

, a headline of the famous news channel BBC BRITISH BROADCASTING CORPORATION revealed that 50% of deprived people are facing financial loss because of the increasing price of coal in the under-developed countries.

Thus

, it will be not a positive step to deal with environmental hazards.

Further

strengthening the view, there are some other renewable

sources

which help to a great extent to tackle

this

situation. The most predominant is solar power because is not emit harmful gases. To explicate it, it does not contribute to the rise of global warming which is the main cause of environmental complications.

For instance

, a recent survey was conducted by the World

Environment

found that 80% of environmental

environment

issues can be handled by constructing solar panels

instead

of putting pressure to increase the cost. So, manufacturing solar power is an effective way to alleviate these nature issues. In conclusion, alternative

sources

can handle the rise of greenhouse gases in the

environment

rather than increase the cost of coal and diesel which may have an adverse effect on society as well as the nation.