Some people want government to spend money on searching for life on other planets. However, others think it is a waste of public money when the earth has so many problems. Discuss these two views and give your own opinion.

These days, more and more governments have started to invest in the area: explore whether other
life
exists or not on other planets. Some
people
support
this
proposal, while others argue that it is wasteful of taxation they paid since more severe issues need to be addressed. In my opinion, I agree that using public money should spend on current problems rather than finding new
life
. From some
people
's perspective, who think it is necessary to search for
life
on other planets, it is generally accepted that humans would run out of resources on the earth one day, so finding a new place as a backup is essential. More importantly, if authorities could find
life
in other parts of the universe, the fact indicates that humans have another optional place to move.
Furthermore
, it is a way to prevent
people
from the threat of unknown creatures. There is an assumption that a group of scientists hold:
people
might be considered by other
life
as lower animals, so taking acts
first
could be a protection for humans.
On the contrary
, others claim that
instead
of spending public money searching for
life
on other planets, authorities should pay more attention to other fields and improve those funds to solve the higher priority issues,
such
as educational and medicinal areas. To cite an example as education, having more governments' financial support can make those illiterate
people
are more affordable to access higher education and find a job to meet their ends.
Moreover
, suppose they invest in medicine, like purchasing more medical machines and encouraging professionals to research those diseases that present technicians cannot solve, like cancer. In that case, it can increase the percentage of well-being
people
and decrease the mortality rate. In conclusion, I reiterate my belief that governments should spend money on issues that are just under
people
's noses, rather than giving funds to a proposal that may take a long time to prove its merits.
Submitted by baozilyn on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: