Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature and history of their own country, rather than the literature and history of other countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people believe is it important to teach

kids

their national article and

history

;

in contrast

, there are some people that

also

believe that global

literature

is as important as the national one.

this

essay will examine both points of view.

firstly

, it is important to build a national pride for children. At an early age, it will be easier for them to accept propaganda, patriotism, and national principles, yet they did not even understand the concept of countries or nations. The article about global

history

will not only make them confused, but it

also

seems not critical for their period of growth and understanding;

for instance

in Soth East Asia, many elementary schools did not conclude the past of other nations and it makes sense because of sometimes the

history

about nations requires deeper analysis and understanding that children do not have.

however

, understanding global

history

and

literature

may create a new concept of thinking that

kids

may need to understand.

This

new approach of thinking can create a linked unsolved mystery of

literature

in

history

that can be discussed and developed to gain their interest in

history

-making;

furthermore

, at elementary school, the person mostly gains their interest and passion that can help them choose the right major for their university. in conclusion, there is nothing wrong with

kids

learning national or global

literature

and

history

and there will be advantages and disadvantages about

kids

learning both. The most important thing is how the parents and teachers eliminate which part is necessary for children to learn so it can be interesting and still understandable for

kids

.