Many governments in the world spend large amounts of money on art, which helps to improve the quality of people’s lives. However, governments should spend money on other things rather than art. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion.

In recent times, people become more interested in

art

to improve their lives. It is argued that government should adopt more policies to increase the investment in other projects,

instead

of

art

. In my personal opinion, it disagrees with

this

argument. The skills of creativity and

communication

associated with

art

may prove my idea.

This

essay will explain my reason in detail.

Firstly

,

art

is important to improve creativity, which is considered a significant element in making technology and scientific progress.

For example

, a computer science student can hardly get a high score in their own subjects without the necessary knowledge of

art

,

such

as painting, music and so on.

Thus

,

art

not only helps the artist to create wonderful products

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

but

also

can be a good friend for a person who studies other subjects.

Therefore

, with more funds invested in

art

by the government, more people will benefit from their

art

experience.

Secondly

, the development of

art

may encourage social

communication

among different persons.

For instance

, a foreign traveller may feel difficult to understand the languages of their destinations, but

art

can help them to raise their interest in the culture.

In addition

, the understanding of

art

products may increase the

communication

between people from different countries or regions.

Thus

, the funds spent on

art

can help the government to share their culture with newcomers and increase the relationship with different backgrounds. In conclusion, the benefit of investing money in

art

is obviously greater than in other projects. It can help the progress of creativity and

communication

.