Many governments in the world spend large amounts of money on art, which helps to improve the quality of people’s lives. However, governments should spend money on other things rather than art. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion.

It has been seen that various nations over the globe are improving their citizens' lives by investing in

art

and

culture

.But there are certain individuals that consider the government should spend

this

amount on improving other services rather than investing in

art

.

However

, I partially agree with

this

notion. People who argue that the centre should not waste money on

art

may think that because there are many countries in which there are more serious issues like unemployment, poverty ,bad education and medical facilities.

Therefore

, they want that the state should improve these facilities

first

rather than wasting money on

art

.

Moreover

, ample access to these services is the basic right of every citizen in order to improve his life.

For example

, in Canada, the government has made education and health services free to everyone because an educated and healthy population is more important for the future of the nation.

On the other hand

, those who support the view that the centre should spend on

art

and

culture

might think that because it has been seen that every country has its unique

art

, tradition and

culture

. And if a country would invest in these sectors

then

there is a probability that it will attract international tourists and

hence

, increase international tourism that contributes to the nation's economy.To illustrate, many provinces in India have built sculptures around historic places just to showcase Indian

culture

and

art

which helps in attracting international tourists all around the world to India. To sum up, every sector has its own importance.

Therefore

, the government should set its priorities according to them it should invest money for the welfare of its people.