Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected. Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Some
animals
have been in danger of extinction. Some people argue that we should protect all wild animals
while
others insist little protection should be placed on the animals
. In this
essay, I will discuss both opinions and argue humans should place safety measures
on wild animals
.
To begin
with, protecting wild animals
brings about both positive and negative outcomes. First of all, the ecosystem will remain stable. For instance
, if whales
are at risk of being extinct, shrimps and plankton, which are the main food of whales
, will increase sharply as fewer whales
eat shrimps and plankton. However
, when some methods are put in place to keep the number of whales
, the system will stay stable. In contrast
, some harmful animals
are also
protected by people's action plans. As a result
, human beings will suffer from the harmful effects caused by those violent beasts.
On the other hand
, few protecting
Replace the word
protection
measures
for wild animals
also
produce beneficial and detrimental implications. Firstly
, only the fittest can survive, which means unless it is strong enough to win against other animals
, it will disappear and go extinct. In other words
, only the finest will remain in the world. Despite this
positive aspect, no safeguard measures
for wild animals
will result in the disappearance of some animals
. For example
, we are now witnessing our precious and harmless koalas are on the brink of disappearing from the earth. Given that safeguard measures
were not placed before and the number of koalas has been significantly decreasing, it
is no doubt that so many other Correct pronoun usage
there
animals
not cared for by people will face a similar destiny.
To sum up
, protecting wild animals
produce
both beneficial and detrimental effects. Correct subject-verb agreement
produces
Similarly
, not putting protection measures
causes not only benign but also
malign ramifications. Given that the positive impacts of protection outweigh the negative aspects of not introducing safety measures
, I think all wild animals
should be protected.Submitted by narsysos on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task response
The essay addresses the task but could provide a more balanced view of the two opinions, and the introduction lacks a clear summary of the main points.
coherence and cohesion
The essay demonstrates some logical structure, but the introduction and conclusion could be developed more effectively.