Some feel that cities should be designed to be beautiful while others feel their functionality is more important. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

In

this

present-day society , there has been much discussion about the construction of cities . Some people see that towns should be beautifully built , while others present they should be constructed functionally.

This

debated issue has ignited public attention from time to time. In

this

essay , different views on that matter will be discussed in the following paragraphs , and

then

my humble opinion will be followed . On the one hand , it can be obviously seen that beautiful cities can bring a vast number of benefits to the country.

First

of all , being famous for their beauty can enhance the tourist attraction which can lead to earning a large amount of foreign income .

In addition

, an aesthetically pleasing city is the main feature of the country.

For example

, as Indonesia is widely well-known for its appealing capital, Bali , there is an increasing number of foreigners visiting there annually.

Therefore

, a beautiful place could likely

to

Fix the infinitive

apply

show examples

have an upper hand , and the results are undeniably impressive.

Nevertheless

, other proponents who adopt a feasible approach assert that basically , the metropolis must be designed in a functional way.

Likewise

, the country’s overall development is highly dependable on its own infrastructure

such

as ease of transportation , having quality health care services and a higher standard of living.

Accordingly

, the government should prioritize

first

to fill the gap

of

Change preposition

in

show examples

citizens’ needs. Having both sides of the argument considered,

although

stunning cities help in earning foreign money , the functionality is the basic ground factor for a nation. What I passionately believe is that if the city was practically structured , it can

consequently

uplift the whole nation ‘s advancement.