Many people think that the government should not restrict what people say in public media as it is part of freedom of speech. To what extent do you agree to this statement?

Freedom
of expression gives special rights and duties to the individuals to speak in public media. Some populace argues that individuals should have the
freedom
to hold opinions and to impart and receive
information
and ideas without interference from the government.
Although
I agree that,
this
is important, I
also
believe that the public has a duty to behave responsibly towards publishing truthful and verified
information
and to respect other people's privacy and reputation. There are several reasons for folks to express themselves freely as it works for the benefit of the entire
society
in keeping the public informed and making sure the public can scrutinise the work of government, politicians and other people who play an important role in
society
.
Therefore
, they are afforded
freedom
and protection.
For example
, the Australian public recently roasted some of the liberal leaders over delays in flood relief funding by using harsher words of criticism and protecting their sources, which resulted in getting quicker funding for the disaster victims.
In addition
,
this
kind of support helps in strengthening and uplifting communities, as they overcome the significant damage caused by these events.
Thus
, it is why media is considered the "watchdog" of every democratic
society
.
However
,
this
does not mean that rights and freedoms are not unlimited, it involves duties and responsibilities to whats said.
Firstly
, an individual's
freedom
of expression may be restricted if he/she oversteps the boundaries of other people’s privacy and reputation.
For example
, when publishing private details that are not relevant for public discussion or allegations that have no factual basis.
Secondly
, they
also
have a special responsibility toward
society
to publish truthfully and verified
information
. In conclusion, It is important that the folks publish truthfully and verified
information
and respect other person's privacy boundaries and reputations. That said, I do believe the media being
society
's watchdog, people should be allowed to express themselves freely for the benefit of the entire
society
.
Submitted by nsing2001 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • freedom of speech
  • democratic societies
  • constitutions
  • diversity of opinions
  • government decisions
  • censorship
  • suppressive
  • dissenting opinions
  • arbitrary
  • detrimental
  • regulation
  • hate speech
  • misinformation
  • social cohesion
  • public safety
  • responsibilities
  • incite
  • discriminate
  • digital media
  • global platforms
  • international cooperation
  • standards
What to do next:
Look at other essays: