Some people think an international car-free day is an effective way to reduce air pollution. Others think there are more effective ways to do this. Discuss both sides and give your opinion

It is often argued that a global day without using

cars

is a productive strategy to diminish air

pollution

.

By contrast

, some of them believe that exist several effective ways to do

this

. In my opinion, I believe that

although

having an international car-free day is an excellent plan to halt atmosphere contamination, other methods can be way better.

On the other hand

, 24 hours without car traffic can be a good method to prevent air contamination.

Cars

are one of the most contributors to

this

problem due to the consumption of fossil

fuels

. The more the use of

fuels

, the more the increase in

pollution

.

For example

, if we stopped all the

cars

for just one day, we would reduce Co2 emissions and

pollution

dramatically.

However

, a growing body of research suggests that focusing on other methods to stop

pollution

can be more impactful than the prohibition of car use.

Firstly

, we can change our

cars

to electric

cars

which can lead to no longer need of using fossil

fuels

.

In addition

, governments should invest more in public transport which would lead to a reduction of

cars

transiting and

consequently

cutting of

pollution

.

For instance

, in Germany, Air

pollution

was diminished due to the changes from ordinary

cars

to electric

cars

. In conclusion, while I acknowledge that one-day banning fossil

fuels

consumed by transport might be an efficient method, I would argue that investing in public transport and electric

cars

would be a better solution to solve

this

issue.