Celebrity status no longer equates with talent/accomplishments. Discuss and give opinion

The latent is a lifetime fixed asset value which does not have any expiry date.

On the other hand

, the superstar is something nobody predicted how long they will be a star in the society and there is no guarantee on your

status

. I would like to discuss and express my opinion with relevant examples of the given statement.

Firstly

, The skill is something which cannot arrive overnight and to obtain it we must put our efforts in all the ways.

In addition

, when you have a good amount of knowledge and it will be helpful to gain goodwill followed by

status

in the city or town. Whereas, being a hero can you confirm how long your

status

will be in the market? and

also

what kind of respect you will receive from citizens?

Secondly

, the talent will influence and

also

motivate the community for the good cause and

this

would help everyone in the society.

Furthermore

, a star

status

can be performed only for the short term as we have a very high competitive industry and later nobody has any idea about their life.

For instance

, as per recent Google survey findings, 90% of stars are standing on their own skills and talent and very few stars are representing their

celebrity

.

However

, undoubtedly, how many talented people are being recognised? are they getting enough support from the local government? wherein , if we look at

celebrity

circumstances and they are getting strong security and high-level support from local bodies too.

Moreover

, some of the local heroes were invited to national level events

such

as audio and movie release functions. At some point, your skill may not influence the public but a hero can motivate the local office team members with their

celebrity

success. To sum up, no matter what you are, being a

celebrity

or a talented star you must respect each and everyone in society.

last

but not least you guys are very much helpful to nations when they are in crisis.