Many would argue that scientific research requires a degree of oversight from the relevant governmental authorities. properly handled, this is a sensible and necessary policy. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
Nowadays, scientific research is becoming more and more prominent in our developed world. It is widely believed that the authority should take scientific exploration under control. In the following paragraphs, I will discuss both pros and cons of
this
Linking Words
issue and support my own response. Let's begin by looking at the disadvantages of the explorations regulated by the relevant governmental authorities.
Initially
Linking Words
, it requires creativity, freedom, time and attention to carry out an effective inquiry. With the interruption of the power bodies, many investigators may face a loss of privacy and freedom. Indeed,
this
Linking Words
may take a lead to the conflict between the authority and researchers. As a consequence, the studies potentially crucial may be worsened and even to be halted.
On the other hand
Linking Words
, the government, supporting financial incentives for the studies is eligible to supervise what the money is being utilized for. What I mean by
this
Linking Words
is that the authorities should regulate whether their investment is used to do specific, vital and relevant probes or not in order not to be disappointed. Another point that speaks for the perks of the government control of research studies is the authority is the only institute that could consider the well-being of the community and ecology. That's why the state's approach should be significantly attentive in order to prevent them from awful results that can be harmful to both people and the globe. In conclusion,
although
Linking Words
a number of subtle drawbacks are genuine, I tend to believe that ministry control is what defines a perfect analysis.
Submitted by uluga2002 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: