Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extend do you agree with this view?

Spending public funds on the arts is sometimes regarded as wasting money.

However

, I am totally opposed to

this

position. Paintings, sculptures and literature are the crucial components of a modern society’s cultural development and should not be underestimated. Undoubtedly, the arts are a way of education and mental growth. In my opinion, people who reckon that paintings

does

Change the verb form

do

show examples

not deserve to be funded do not realize their influence on humankind’s progress. Pictures can tell generations about history and traditions that could be forgotten for good unless

this

essential part of society’s legacy.

For instance

, some historical facts are known nowadays only because the evidence was found after investigations of different sculptures and icons.

Furthermore

, I am convinced that without pieces of art people will not be able to maintain some of the ethnic groups’ customs.

Nonetheless

, some of the art objects are kept in

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

inappropriate conditions,

that is

why

government

Add an article

the government

show examples

, in my view, ought to support financially collections and create public museums. They will allow us to save the majority of masterpieces and protect them from damage or disappearance. Admittedly,

such

a way will defend a vast majority of essential ancient inventions. To sum up, regardless

some

Change preposition

of some

show examples

individuals are against spending money on cultural facilities I reckon that photographs and sculptures are extremely important for

personal

Add an article

the personal

show examples

educational process.

Moreover

, they are a part of humankind’s cultural and historical heritage and should be saved with the help of the government, which can provide funds for the implementation of

this

plan.