Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think is a positive or negative development?

There has been a drastic debate over whether is good or not for

countries

to become more and more similar due to people being able to buy the same items anywhere. In

this

essay, I will discuss both these views and give my own opinion on the matter.

Firstly

, I will explore the way

this

innovation has changed the way human beings have similar products and

secondly

, I will share the drawbacks of

this

trend.

To begin

with,

this

attitude towards it is positive, I believe the case of

this

can be beneficial. In

this

case where we can buy the same products anywhere in a kind of globalization. In

this

situation, we can benefit a lot from it. 1st opinion, it will help to narrow the gaps between rich states and poor states. Poor states derive the right to buy commodities as same as the rich ones. In

this

addition, buying the same products anywhere is able to promote competition among the retailers, which can not only lower the price of goods but

also

better the quality.

Besides

,

this

kind of change will affect the other

countries

' economies. Because of ,

this

some

countries

became powerful. For, example if every nation has the same machinery

this

will

be directly impact

Change the verb form

directly impact

show examples

export and import. In

this

process, it has a possibility for different

countries

to tighten their connection and strengthen communication, resulting in efficiency enhanced. To summarize the above, I imagine that

this

kind of fusion of market is positive, not only can it benefit customers, but

also

do well for the whole market. We are able to insist on globalization can all

countries

profit from it.