Some people think that one of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuels for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is a controversial opinion whether increasing the petrol price for motor vehicles is the most effective means of tackling environmental issues. In my perspective, I completely disagree with

this

opinion and there are two main reasons for

this

. In

this

essay, I am going to elaborate on the reasons.

First

of all, cars are an essential part of our current society, and increasing fuel fees could hugely impact our expenses and threaten our lives.

This

is especially evident in rural areas because insufficient public transportation is not uncommon in these areas, and they usually rely on motor vehicles for their transportation.

Furthermore

, the main industry in these areas tends to be farming, which requires them to consume more petrol to run farming

machineries

Change the wording

machinery

types of machinery

pieces of machinery

show examples

.

Therefore

, raising petrol fees can be a life-threatening way

although

there is potential to alleviate current environmental problems.

Secondly

, the emission of exhaust gas from motor vehicles is not only the source of carbon footprint.

For instance

, coal plants to produce electricity are a large contributor to the increase in carbon dioxide, leading to climate change and

rise

Correct article usage

a rise

show examples

in sea level. Not only

this

but

also

having cattle for our food is said to be one of the largest sources of carbon dioxide emission. These issues should be considered along with reducing car emission gases. In summary, increasing fuel fees has enormous effects on our lives and,

this

is not the primary source of detridamaging nature.

Thus

, other measures to improve environmental issues and protect nature should be addressed

first

.