A test for cycling should be mandatory. Do you agree or disagree?

There is no doubt that cycling should be encouraged as a way of transportation.

Although

I believe that there should be tests to control bicycles on the

road

, I do not think that these should be necessary for everyone who wants to ride a bike.

First

, bicycles can be hazardous to the rider and the

road

,

hence

we should make sure that cyclists are competent enough.

For example

, a person who has recently learned how to ride a bike should not be allowed to use it on a

road

full of cars and people. If we let them ride their bikes without a test, we will not only expose them to the dangers of traffic accidents, but we will

also

put those around them in imminent danger.

Nevertheless

, I do not think that

this

should be a mandatory requirement for everyone.

This

is because those who want to learn how to ride bicycles need places to practice before cycling on the

road

. Recent cyclists,

for instance

, will feel more comfortable once they rode their

bicycle

Fix the agreement mistake

bicycles

show examples

in a safe place, beforehand.

Furthermore

, giving them a wide space to practice will give them a chance to master cycling,

thus

it will greatly

lower

Wrong verb form

lowering

show examples

the accident rates. In conclusion,

although

I believe that cyclist testing is necessary to avoid

road

accidents, I

also

think that it should not be mandatory because new cyclists need to practice before we can let them ride on the

road

, where they are surrounded by other vehicles and pedestrians.