Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be close down. Other however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals. Discuss both opinion and give your own experience

Animal conservation is one of the biggest issues in today's modern society that the public puts a lot of concentration on.

As a result

, some criticise the unethical of zoos and are against their exit of them whereas others believe these places are essential for

animals

. From my perspective, I think

this

kind of park is the most adequate place to protect these

species

from extinction. On the one hand, there are two primary drawbacks of keeping

animals

in captivity.

Firstly

, it is tough to feel the freedom while staying the rest of their lives in cages which are not as large as their homeland. In the long term, these

species

absolutely raise a sense of boredom within a limited space which does not naturally belong to them.

Secondly

, staying out of their habitats drives these creatures to fade their instincts. A tiger,

for instance

, has to deal with many predators each day in the wild

such

as lions, now lying all day in their brick-and-mortar houses which prevents them from sharpening their original hunting and self-protecting skills.

On the other hand

, being captive in zoos may conserve

animals

in many ways.

To begin

with, conservation places supply high-quality diets with all supplements required for each

species

living there. It means that they are cushioned from starvation compared with their wild counterparts who might have to fight for foodstuff every day.

Moreover

, wildlife parks will shelter them from many nasty things happening in nature

such

as hunters, disasters, diseases, etc; even the risk of being wiped out from the Earth. In conclusion, the quality of life in captivity can be higher than in the wild, so it is not cruel to maintain

animals

in zoos that, constant, secure numerous

species

from extinction or unexpected, instant, dramatic problems in nature, constantly.