Animals are in a danger of extinction . Some peolle think that we should protect only those animals which are useful for humans. To what extent do you agree or disagree with statement?

A large number of types of

animals

are in a danger and on the brink of extinction. For

this

reason, some humans think that should be protected only those

animals

which are useful for our lifestyle. I totally disagree with

this

opinion, as I believe that could be saved all creatures who are living on our planet.

First

of all, humans ought to provide protection not only for useful

animals

but all alive things on our planet. These activities will be fair towards every creature, as they stabilize the animal kingdom.

For example

, if one type of bestial will die,

then

will begin chaos in our natural world. Each little creature influence of ecosystem’s lifestyle. For the whole of our world’s life, folks have been killing a lot of different types of entities. These activities begin to complete the disappearance of predators, herbivores, birds, fish and others. The

second

key factor is that humanity does not completely investigate our flora and fauna. As that technologies and people’s brains are not enough developed to understand the structure of the native world. Humankind still doesn’t know what kind of

animals

are living in hard-to-reach places, like deep waters, caves, and uninhabited jungles.

For instance

, recently science find a new type of fish in Antarctica. They dwell in cold water under a degree -36 C. It proves that falk doesn’t have enough information about the history and the lifetime not only of our planet but the galaxy too. Despite

this

, science continues to develop and recognize new knowledge. In conclusion, I strongly disagree with

this

idea, as I feel that should be defended for each alive, who dwells on the Earth. Mankind ought to take care of all.