Wild animals have no use in the 21 century and trying to preserve animals now is just wastage of money. To what extent do you agree or disagree with question

There has been a controversy about whether we should protect wild

animals

in the 21 century. I think we definitely need to continue protecting wild

animals

, and my reasons will be explained in the following paragraphs.

First

,

humans

are a member of the earth; protecting other

creatures

is a request of human civilization. The species on the planet have developed for billions of years; during

this

time, there are some

creatures

have been extinct due to natural disasters,

such

as climate change or earthquakes.

However

, before the advent of

humans

, no

creatures

had the power to extinct other living beings drastically. People's weapons, like, guns

that

Correct pronoun usage

apply

show examples

overshadowed

animals

' teeth, furs, and claws. According to

this

huge advantage of

humans

, we have become dominant on

this

planet; we have controlled all the important resources,

such

as water and land.

On the contrary

, we have become the biggest blight on the earth as well, because we bring all sorts of destruction and pollution.

Therefore

, protecting

animals

is in line with modern civilization.

Second

, protecting other lives is protecting ourselves.

For example

, nature is a cyclic system, if we exterminate some

creatures

,

then

this

system is bound to collapse;

in addition

, based on the current level of

humans

, we still need to rely on nature.

Hence

, if we ruin the environment,

kill

Correct word choice

and kill

show examples

other

animals

, we are actually eradicating ourselves. Regarding those farm

animals

, e.g., pigs or chickens, we treat them in a civilized way as well rather than killing them ruthlessly. In conclusion, we need to protect wild

animals

inarguably. Regarding those endangered

animals

, we should use our power to help them.