some people believe the best way to tackle pollution is by paying tax others disagree. discuss both views and state your opinion

Some individuals opine that the best way to reduce

pollution

is by making organisations

to

Fix the infinitive

apply

show examples

pay a huge tax. Others argue that the menace can be tackled by using other methods. I believe other techniques

such

as awareness and regulations can help in the eradication of

this

problem. On the one hand, companies are polluting the environment adversely. A high amount of carbon iv oxide is released into the atmosphere which has detrimental effects on human health. The expansion and growth of

such

companies will reduce. if the government can impose a tax on them and the money generated can be used to eradicate environmental

pollution

.

For example

, in Nigeria, the authorities increased the tax on pharmaceutical industries because they produce heavy waste.

This

led to the reduction of waste products released and lesser establishment of drug companies.

On the other hand

, many industries and the public are not aware of the health issues

such

as the increased risk of cardiovascular infection, lung cancer and heart problems associated with

pollution

. Public awareness through television commercials, advertisements and social media can be done by the government.

This

allows the industries to know more about the danger that comes with toxic chemicals released, thereby limiting it.

Furthermore

, the leaders can regulate the pollutants from factories by placing a strict limit on the amount of carbon iv oxide and waste produces released from each company and ensuring every organisation abide by the rule.

Thus

, curbing the issues of industrial

pollution

. In conclusion, even though taxing factories can lessen the harmful chemicals they produce, I believe more publicity and setting rules are more effective ways to curb

this

issue.