Some people believe that it's fairer to assess a students ability based on their performance during the whole course rather than giving a formal examination at the end of the course. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is a saying "Learning is never-ending" , most parents want their children to excel in their studies to move forward. But what comes as a surprise here is how are these pupils assessed? And that differs in every education system in different countries. Some people think grading their performance throughout the course is a much fairer deal than at the end of the term in an examination. And I agree with it, provided there are certain factors which can definitely help and improve many education systems.
Firstly
, as students finish their primary education with a maximum of only four subjects, they have to build more confidence and patience because at the secondary level subjects vary from six to nine. In
this
particular area, they have to prepare for each and every subject, now depending on the country's schooling system and assessments they are promoted or demoted from
one
grade to another.
For instance
, in India enlistments have four unit tests between the semesters,
one
half-yearly test and
one
final examination.
One
severe lagging point noticed by many parents and faculty was admissions are not learning but mugging things up before the examination.
Hence
, in the end,these children are not really getting educated about the subject but preparing the exact questions in the exercises and writing the final exams to score.
In contrast
, when compared to those learning systems where recruitments have judged not on the basis of final marking but their overall performance throughout the year, students actually put in the effort to learn. Recently, an Educational Research group published a paper on the difference between these two types of student learning experiences and found more engagement when it comes to the latter approach of consistent teaching and assessing.
For example
, in European countries the
second
approach of engagement and experiential learning has greatly impacted, pupils work on multiple assignments, activities in between the terms which hold more marking and adding the final paper to it altogether holds a hundred per cent degree.
Hence
, equal distribution to all the aspects of the curriculum not just the
last
piece of the term. In conclusion, it can be clearly understood how the continuous preparation can improve the student's ability to learn and acquire more knowledge throughout a study year and how based on these results other nations should
also
go ahead and change their ideology of judging a student based on their marks
Submitted by nguyentatthang1981 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Word Count

IELTS says that you should write a minimum of 250 words in writing task 2. If you go under word count you will lose marks in task response.

A very long essay will not give you a higher band score.

Aim for between 260 to 290 words in writing task 2. This will ensure a concise essay and will be realistic in terms of time management. You have only 40 minutes to write the essay and you need around 10 minutes of planning time, so you will not be able to write a long essay in 30 minutes.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Essentional vocabulary list for IELTS Writing 7+

Learn how to write high-scoring essays with powerful words.
Download Free PDF and start improving you writing skills today!
What to do next:
Look at other essays: