In many parts of the world, children are given more freedom than in the past. Is this a positive or negative development?

Some countries are giving more independence to the youngsters in recent times compared to the past. I guess

this

is a negative development because of two rock-solid reasons.

First

of all, more

freedom

for a child means he/she is not inclined to discipline.

As a result

, it is very much possible that a kid is playing during the time of studying. In

this

way, it is possible that they will not be good at sports as well as studying.

Hence

, it can be ended up with poor career prospects. If they could do so, they would definitely suffer in the long run in their career growth.

Therefore

, excessive independence leads to poor academics which is harmful to a child.

Secondly

, extreme

freedom

sometimes helps to develop aggressive behaviour among children. It is often found that a youngster without boundaries easily develops disrespectful behaviour,

such

as disobedience, and many more.

In addition

to these, limitless

freedom

more often than not let a kid become violent in their later life.

That is

to say, they can easily be involved with a crime,

for example

, money laundering or even murders in their mature periods of life.

Hence

, an excessive amount of independence develops aggressive manners among children which are harmful to them. In conclusion, it must be said that

freedom

without a limit can make an amateur indisciplined which is worse for their career and it

also

creates unexpected behaviour among him/her that turn them to be violent in their later life. So, I reckon it is a negative development.