Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad, Discuss both views and state your opinion.

In Hungary, the question of hosting an international sport, regardless of the

event

's type, is a hot debate topic. In the following essay, my main goal is to examine the cost-benefit ratio and

then

take a side in the argument.

Firstly

, any

sports

event

requires vast financial and human capital despite its type, size and length. In most cases, the hosting

country

's governments finance these events because they believe the cost-benefit ratio of hosting international

sports

events is worth it. On the one hand, I firmly believe that holding international

sports

events should fit with the

country

's short- and long-term strategic goals.

For example

, if a

country

's goal is to increase its recognition among foreign people who can be possible tourists in the future,

then

hosting a

sports

event

which is being watched by millions of people can be a great thing.

On the other hand

, an international and well-known

sports

event

can attract thousands of tourists to the hosting

country

. The significant number of tourists can boost the

sports

event

's regions and depend on the

country

's size and economic performance. As previously discussed, hosting an international

sports

event

requires a considerable commitment and investment. The output of

this

whole process is not" just" a well-known

event

but

also

a facility capable of hosting it. Following an international

sports

event

, these facilities can be used by the everyday sportsman daily. Because of its complexity, there is not an exact answer to the question of whether is it worth hosting an international

sports

event

or not. The way I see it, every government should take as many factors as possible into consideration,

then

calculate and the decide whether is it worth or not.