The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is still controversial whether implementing a higher

fuel

fee is the best solution to the worldwide issue of the

environment

. While some people oppose

this

point of view, I partly agree with it. In

this

essay, I will delve deep into both sides of the argument and give out my logical conclusion. On the one hand, there is a school of thought objecting to

this

opinion. To elucidate, people disapproving of

this

idea would argue that there may be some better ways to tackle the international environmental problem. One possible alternative is that the government should provide citizens with proper knowledge about the

environment

and its importance to human life.

Therefore

, people would be more conscious of preserving the

environment

.

On the other hand

, I hold the belief that phasing in an increase in

fuel

cost would be the best solution to address the worldwide environmental issue. As a matter of fact, a higher

fuel

fee could act as a deterrent, which may discourage drivers from using their private vehicles

such

as cars or motorbikes.

Consequently

, there would be fewer exhaust fumes released into the

environment

,

thus

helping to improve the air quality

in particular

as well as the

environment

in general.

For example

, the Vietnam government has recently implemented a tax rise on

fuel

, which has decreased the proportion of private vehicle drivers by 20%. In conclusion,

although

other measures to tackle the international problem of the

environment

could be advantageous to some extent, I would argue that raising the cost of

fuel

would be the most effective way to address

this

issue.