Living in a big city can be bad for people's health. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In

this

Linking Words

contemporary epoch. There is irrefutable debate among folk about the impact of large places and there are copious inhabitants who argue that it would be devastating for a person's health to live in a populated centre. I partially agree with

this

Linking Words

view and the reasons for

this

Linking Words

statement will be discussed in the forthcoming paragraphs.

To begin

Linking Words

, the positive side of

this

Linking Words

notion is that cities are loaded with traffic that produces carbon monoxide which is injurious to health and as well as noise pollution which is the

second

Linking Words

preponderant effect of living in these areas. To cite an example, According to a recent survey, 30% of Lahore,s population spend their lives in depressed conditions because of unsatisfied noises like vehicles horns, industrial machines, construction equipment etc.

As a result

Linking Words

, these kinds of things can make life more worst.

On the other hand

Linking Words

, to exemplify the views for the statement of why I disagree. The most preponderant point is that large societies assist individuals with various amenities

such

Linking Words

as efficient hospitality, a clean climate, better schooling and stuff like that.

In addition

Linking Words

to

this

Linking Words

, the benefits they provide do not only do work, when they come to be effective but

also

Linking Words

enhance productivity and quality of life with much ease, efficacy and convenience.

As a result

Linking Words

, the merits provided by these cities can not surpass. In the nutshell, According to the forenamed quarrels, I go for the balanced result because it is true that there is a risk to the health by living in cities but the advantages offered by these cannot ignore