Some people think secondary/high school students should study only literature from their own countries.Others,however,believe students should study literature from all around the world.

Some people argue that students should learn only their country's

literature

like poems,novels and others while others have reverse opinions on

this

issue.Personally, I believe both national and global

literature

can provide a range of benefits to students and learning which

literature

should be optional for both secondary and high school undergraduates. On the one hand,focusing only on national

literature

provides a number of benefits.

First

and foremost,learning about their own culture,

literature

and life in the past gives them a sense of identity.In

this

way,they dive deep into their history.In outline, the

literature

of their own country gives them a more general notion about their descendants and how their lives were.At the same time,

this

approach is appealing to teachers,as well.An emphasis on a smaller range of

literature

gives educators a narrower teaching scope,making curriculum design an easier task.

As a result

,both teachers' and students' work will be much easier.

By contrast

,learning global

literature

like Chinese or Russian

literature

has

also

particular merits.

First

off,these kinds of literary works are good ways to widen the horizon.By doing so,each and every student will be able to enlarge their knowledge.

Moreover

,reading world

literature

gives great enjoyment to every reader.Why would people want to limit themselves with their own when they have a whole range of world masterpieces in front of them. To conclude,

Although

focusing solely on national composition offers certain benefits, global

literature

as well provides you with a wider horizon and great enjoyment of reading.That's why every learner should be given a choice in terms of what to study in

literature

classes.