The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. Do you agree or disagree?

There are those who have suggested the possibility of totally banning all advertising. In my opinion, though

this

would seemingly improve society, the actual impact would be to imperil the global economy. Supporters of a prohibition argue the injurious impact of advertising on human society and health. On the most superficial level, advertising is distracting. Individuals must strive to avoid ads on television, online, on billboards, and in magazines. All

this

can contribute to the anxiety and declining mental health that characterizes modern man. Beyond

this

, advertising has a pernicious impact on how the world operates. Corporations and entire national economies are structured around an ideal of continual consumption that not only harms the environment but

also

transforms individuals into a means for a financial end.

Nonetheless

, actually banning advertising would disrupt the global financial system. Nearly every nation and economy

depends

Change the verb form

depend

show examples

on advertising as the foundation of a capitalist system. Some of the largest companies in the world, including Facebook and Google, generate the vast majority of their revenue from targeted marketing and their dissolution would have ramifications across a range of industries. The implications could

also

become deeper. If individuals and companies no longer had the ability to advertise products and services, they would likely lose the motivation to innovate. Over time,

this

could result in stifling progress in major fields ranging from medicine and internet technology to entertainment and the sciences more generally. In conclusion, despite the negative effects of advertising on human society, it is an important catalyst for growth in the modern world. Advertisements should be regulated but not eliminated entirely.