Some people think that professional athletes make good role models for young people, while others believe they don’t. Discuss both these points of views and give your own opinion

Many young people look up to

athletes

as

role

models

. There is just something attractive about the thought of being in good physical condition and being talented in sports. Others,

however

, question whether they are good

models

for

children

. In

this

essay, I will examine both sides of the argument and present my point of view. In many cases, young, talented and charismatic

athletes

are natural

role

models

for

children

.

First,

if the athlete is enthusiastic about being a

role

model and devotes time and energy to community activities, his or her activities are beneficial to

children

. Examples are making appearances at neighbourhood events, serving on local boards, or working with charity organisations.

Second,

if the athlete displays a healthy balance between striving for excellence and having fun in the process, he or she will encourage the virtues of working hard to achieve goals and the importance of enjoying the journey to

such

goals. From

this

,

children

can learn about the process of achieving goals and managing to overcome difficulties they may have in the future.

However

, professional

athletes

are not always good

role

models

. An athlete has no moral obligation to be a

role

model for young people, and the

role

of

athletes

is simply to perform on the court or field of play. It is true that

athletes

may have money and fame and

therefore

take up a significant amount of

children

’s screen time, but that does not mean we should necessarily put faith in them as

role

models

outside of the stadium. In conclusion, many

athletes

can be seen as good

role

models

in some aspects, but it cannot be said that they are perfect

role

models

. Putting too much faith in them may do more harm than good and parents should try to provide the best

models

for their

children

.