Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters. Do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that during a natural catastrophe, wealthy
countries
should
support
other impoverished
nations
. In
this
essay, I agree with
this
statement because richer
countries
have more experience and higher financial stability. The wealthy
nations
often have more experience than other
countries
because they used to face many situations and those experiences lead to protection strategies in their country.
For example
, Japan is one of the
countries
that often faced natural disasters
such
as earthquakes that cause tremendous damage and losses of both construction and human resources for the past centuries,
therefore
, the Japanese are able to understand the loss of other
nations
the most.
Moreover
, they can provide instruction to the damaged
countries
in order to help them recover faster, and allow them to have more protection in the future.
Countries
which are suffered from disasters from nature events often need financial
support
in order to help their population regain their stabilities. Most
countries
with higher financial positions are willing to give some of their
money
in the country’s reserve to help other
people
. Recent research concludes that
people
who have earned more
money
are always looking forward to helping
people
who are in need as we saw large-scale companies often did charitable activities.
On the other hand
,
people
who earn a limited amount of
money
are focused on managing their
money
by themselves. To conclude, it is undeniable and I am fully agreed that poorer
countries
do need advice and
support
from prosperous
countries
as those experience
countries
will provide effective practice and
support
, and those
nations
are
also
wealthy enough to financially
support
those injured
countries
.
Submitted by niewnattha on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Humanitarian relief
  • Infrastructure
  • Global solidarity
  • Disproportionately
  • External assistance
  • Rebuilding efforts
  • Disaster response
  • Investment in stability
  • Dependency theory
  • Responsible intervention
  • Paternalistic
  • Shared humanity
  • Sovereignty
  • Capabilities
  • Fatality rates
What to do next:
Look at other essays: