Some people believe that the effective way to reduce industrial pollution is to tax the companies which cause these types of pollution. others think that there are other ways. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

myriad individuals opinion that in order to imitate the root cause of manufacturing pollution, the

government

should compel

taxes

to

Change preposition

on

show examples

industrial sectors.

However

, it is undeclinable that

this

solution can have transparent impacts on society as a whole, I am strongly in disagreement. Those who are in favour of implementing the population

taxes

on corporations point to the profit aspects. To commence with, corporations are meant to run to gain the benefits and distribute

to

Correct pronoun usage

them to

show examples

their shareholders and the company owners. If the

government

introduces regulations on billing pollution

taxes

on hazardous

wastes

that the

companies

discharge into the environment, these sectors are more

likelihood

Replace the word

likely

show examples

of finding the optimal solutions to compose their

wastes

before sending garbage to the landfills as well as choosing more environmental-friendly products as their ingredients

thus

they will pay

less

Change the quantifier

fewer

show examples

taxes

.

For example

, the

companies

who produce fruits normally using plastic bags to pack their products are more likely to utilize other alternating compose packaging which consumers can reuse several times

such

as a cup and leaves of plants to minimize their pollution tax payments. Ultimately, the amount of industrial

waste

will expect a dramatic fall.

On the other hand

, people

who

Change the pronoun

whom

show examples

flashback to

this

idea point out that household

wastes

should be

also

put into consideration.

Firstly

, the production of industrial products will just simply try to meet the demand of their customers. It is undoubtedly that people experience overpopulation which requires a high amount of food and services. Charging

taxes

on the

companies

which generate the most polluted

wastes

for the environment will be a catalyst for preventing them from producing goods that impact people's survival.

Instead

of charging

taxes

on industrial sectors, the

government

can offer tax incentives to the

companies

that are successful in recycling their

wastes

.

Secondly

, the

government

should alert their citizens about the danger of not recycling household

waste

before putting their rubbish into garbage cans.

Additionally

, educating students and making

waste

categorisation in school in the emphasis can be a positive contributor to addressing environmental problems. though these are minor adjustments, in the aggregate they can be meaningful. In conclusion, even though billing

taxes

on

companies

which discharge dangerous

wastes

in the wild field can have tangible effects, I strongly believe that each individual's actions can assist to reduce the amount of

waste

in the environment.