Some people think that international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution;however, others think that there are other ways. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Over the past few decades, the world has evolved and challenged substantially in many ways. The rate of

car

owners has multiplied over

this

period. Some people state that the ideal solution for eradicating problems caused by air pollution is international

car-free

days

, while others think that there are other plausible measures. At

this

point of juncture, both these views are analysed in the ensuing paragraphs to show that I agree with the latter statement.

Firstly

, conducting

car-free

days

among countries restricts a huge amount of carbon deposit to the

atmosphere

within a day, which is the prime reason why some people believe that

such

days

are to be prioritised.

However

, avoiding personal needs and schedules for a day does not bring significant changes to the detrimental effect on the

atmosphere

. To explain

further

, people tend to put off certain commitments and needs which most probably they commit on other

days

. In

such

scenarios, rather than saving the

atmosphere

from toxic fumes, it induces more impact in a long run.

Therefore

,

car-free

days

are not a feasible measure for reducing the impacts.

On the other hand

, the major reason why some individuals including me assert that there are other ways to face the challenge is that replacing fossil fuels

such

as crude oil and coal with electricity brings potential advantages in the bigger picture. To make it more clear, thousands of poisonous gases are emitted by petrol and diesel

cars

due to combustion.

In contrast

, electric

cars

use electricity to power up and run the whole mechanical properties of a

car

from power stores in cells, without releasing any pollutants into the air.

Therefore

, a significant rate of deadly substances could be avoided.

For instance

, "tesla" a US-based electric

car

manufacturer claims that an electric

car

saves the motherland from getting poisoned by approximately two tonnes of carbon each year, by a single

car

.

As a result

company's reputation and value have skyrocketed dramatically.

Moreover

, as per public recommendations and

suggestions

Add a comma

,suggestions

show examples

the company has introduced not only new

cars

but

also

industrial level

Add a hyphen

industrial-level

show examples

trucks that

functions

Correct subject-verb agreement

function

show examples

fully on

solar powered

Add a hyphen

solar-powered

show examples

batteries. To conclude, the increased number of

cars

is an acute problem, because it

pave

Change the verb form

paves

show examples

path

Add an article

the path

a path

show examples

to no major changes in forming cautious substances. Even though

car-free

days

have benefits for a short period, it is improbable to be eradicated. While other concrete measures like electric

cars

and

solar based

Add a hyphen

solar-based

show examples

innovations that help to decline the

amount

Change the quantifier

number

show examples

of venoms

for

Change preposition

in

show examples

the

atmosphere

should be promoted.