Some people believe that increasing tax on various industries will reduce pollution whereas others believe that there are better alternative ways. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

There are several compelling arguments about industrial

pollution

and effective

ways

of reducing it. While some people are in

favor

Change the spelling

favour

show examples

of a rising

tax

on different industries in order to decrease environmental

pollution

, others assert that some alternative

ways

should exist that are more efficient.

This

essay will discuss both views followed by my own opinion. On the one hand, some hold the view that heavy taxes can be effective in

pollution

reduction in some

ways

.

To begin

with, one of the main reasons for air

pollution

caused by

factories

is greenhouse gas emissions

as a result

of the use of fossil fuel as an energy source in some

factories

. In order to reduce the amount of

such

detrimental gasses, governments can courage factory owners to use green fuel with some

tax

promotion programs.

in addition

,

tax

increases can result in a reduction in the amount of waste

that is

produced by industry.

On the other hand

, the opposing view asserts that some alternative

ways

can help to control

pollution

produced by industry more efficiently. The main way to justify their belief is that high taxation may not be a concern for some profitable industries.

Moreover

, allocating budget to scientific projects about the issues related to

pollution

can be more help for. A good example of

this

can be working on recycling

factories

' wastes

instead

of burning or burying them. To conclude,

although

views differ about whether the

tax

on industries should increase in order to reduce the population, I profoundly believe that governments should provide materials and conditions for

factories

that are beneficial for the environment,

such

as better fuel and better recycling.