Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Due to the expansion of population in modern society, what transportation is a priority for

governments

to spend more money on?

This

sparks a heated discussion. Some people think it must be

railways

, and I totally agree with

this

statement. To start with, the main reason is that more people move to cities from their hometowns now.

As a result

, there is a large demand for them to travel between different places to balance their work and family in rural areas. If more trains with higher speed and frequency are established,

for example

,

this

will reduce the fatigue of these individuals and can

also

help save their time.

In addition

, more

railways

mean that a country has more capacity to transport not only passengers but

also

cargo and commodities, which will definitely contribute to the development of industry and commerce. To put it simply, some international trades

also

depend on

railways

.

This

transportation will bring more income for

governments

and

therefore

, the wealth can be invested in other aspects of transportation construction

consequently

.

On the other hand

, some may argue that the traffic problem is so severe in urban areas,

thus

it is urgent for

governments

to cope with

this

issue.

Nevertheless

, it cannot blame on the amount and the quality of roads.

This

is caused by too many private cars, which will not be improved in the short term, even if

governments

spend all of the money. But developed

railways

probably provide a new method for people,

for instance

, to across cities to work, and

this

can help alleviate the stress of roads. In conclusion, building

railways

better will benefit both the public and society. Meanwhile, the effect cannot be seen immediately if

governments

pay lots of attention to improving roads. For these reasons, I believe that constructing

railways

should be put in the

first

place.