government should spend more money on railways rather than roads. to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.

an arising issue which is global warming has made people more aware in seeking alternatives of transportation, especially public
trains
.
Thus
, people argue whether or not the government should invest more money in railways
instead
of roads. In my opinion, I strongly agree with
this
statement due to its justifications. The more monetary policies are aided in rail lines, the more approachable public
trains
become. Due to that, citizens can easily get to the nearest station and travel anywhere more safely.
In addition
, if subways are widely introduced to the public, the price will be significantly more affordable for commuters from many classes in terms of commuting. 
For instance
, students who haven't got a job can use
trains
as a solution when gas prices are increasing.
Besides
, not only the number of tracks should be expanded but
also
the quality of both rails and internal facilities must be taken into great consideration.
For example
, funds are necessary to innovate the way railroads work in order to maximize safety and minimize errors or risks during routes. enhancing the service quality will get even more residents to use subways which contributes to a considerable decrease in greenhouse gas emission into the air.
On the other hand
, the reason why track requires more capital investments is that
this
system is
also
responsible for national as well as multilateral merchandise transportation. With cutting-edge technology and enough stability, the process of delivering supplies, goods and materials becomes much more smoothly and saves various kinds of travel expenses like fuel or even labour for authorities.
Nevertheless
, there are still a few drawbacks to using a convoy
such
as less versatility and demanding huge amounts of fees for maintenance and repair once accidents occur. If choosing to travel by car, people can have a different schedule per their own decisions rather than fixed routes of
trains
. Though,
this
system still offers numerous perks which the payment poured . In conclusion, authorities and governments should take rail lines expansion seriously and come up with reasonable financial supplies in order to make the national development more sustainable for their residents
Submitted by qdang1042 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: