Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree?

Scientific inquiry plays a very important role in the progress of a nation. It is argued that research should be controlled and funded by the authority, and not private organisations or institutions.
This
essay agrees with the argument that the authorities should carry out various experiments and works in different fields and will outline the reasons why bureaucrats should be responsible for
such
projects. There are several reasons to support my viewpoint.
Firstly
, the ministry is capable of providing financial assistance to various probe projects.
Moreover
, if the project fails to achieve its objectives, the government has the resources to cope with the losses incurred.
Secondly
, the main motive of the rule in conducting probes is public welfare.
Thirdly
, when the state funds investigation activities, there is utmost security. They do not disclose any information which could hamper national security.
That is
why research and development in the field of the military are carried out by the state. When private organisations conduct probes, their chief concern is protecting their interests.
This
explains why the inquiry conducted by coffee companies or gum companies only highlights the benefits of their products.
This
is not the case when the power funds investigation. In
this
case, the final verdict is more likely to be unbiased. To conclude, after analysing the various aspects of the argument, it is not hard to see that the political funding of experiments is in the interests of the public. Private organizations,
on the other hand
, may have their own vexed interests to protect.
Submitted by Abhishek on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • scientific research
  • carried out
  • controlled
  • governments
  • private companies
  • unbiased
  • prioritize
  • profit
  • public interest
  • allocate resources
  • lucrative
  • collaboration
  • information sharing
  • confidential
  • competitive advantage
What to do next:
Look at other essays: