Some people believe that car-free days are effective ways to reduce air pollution. However, others argue that there are other ways that are more effective. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

In the present situation,

air

pollution

has become a common concern all over the globe, which has to be mitigated. Some people insist that avoiding using private

cars

for a day can bring about a huge amount of merits in dwindling the

air

pollution

, while others maintain that there are more effective methods to deal with

this

problem. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the former argument. At the outset, it is undeniable that not only does using private vehicles exacerbate the

air

quality, but the industry fields

also

take a huge responsibility. To be specific, offering higher taxes to the industries may exert a positive impact on alleviating

air

pollution

. Another measure worth mentioning is encouraging individuals to take transportations in their daily lives,

thus

this

will eventually lead the number of vehicles on the road that emits fumes.

Nevertheless

, I am strongly convinced that preventing the use of

cars

can be the most influential way to solve

air

pollution

. There is no doubt that it is the fumes from the vehicles that are the staple culprit of deteriorating the standard of

air

quality. According to research conducted by the U.S government, the use of private

cars

comprised 68%, which increases carbon and sulphur dioxide.

Furthermore

, the term 'consistency' is a major fact that allows problems to be solved or at least reduced. What I mean is that compared with increasing the taxes, which seems to be temporary, making a specific day with no

cars

as a policy will constantly lower the carbon footprint, and

as a result

,

this

policy may bring about a substantial impact on society in the long term. In conclusion,

although

there are several methods that can aid in mitigating

air

pollution

, I am firm in my opinion that avoiding the use of

cars

is the most crucial part of dealing with the never unsurmountable problem if the government takes action there and

then

.