Some believe that nuclear weapons benefit the world at large. to what extent do you agree or disagree.

There is a view that the whole

world

would be affected by the benefits of nuclear

weapons

. I absolutely agree with

this

point of view due to the fact that

this

approach could prohibit countries to engage in a

war

.

To begin

with, if all nations around the

world

have nuclear

weapons

, other warlike countries would not have enough bravery to attack them because the enemy is aware that the country would be eradicated thoroughly.

For instance

, the soviet union and the United States in the cold

war

were not engaged in a destroying

war

despite the myriad of problems both had. So, not only do nuclear

weapons

deter governments from starting a destructive

war

, but they

also

preserve the peace among nations.

However

, some people may claim that nuclear

weapons

could not be beneficial for the whole

world

owing to the fact that the

first

mistake would be the

last

.

For example

, if one operator, who works on a border, observes an erroneous sign of

war

and invades other countries with nuclear

weapons

, other nations will defend themselves with that

weapons

.

This

vicious circle would be a disaster that will put humankind in danger of extinction.

Although

this

phenomenon will be a catastrophe, shooting a nuclear weapon is not a decision that one person makes and a lot of other deterrent things would prohibit the commencement of the

war

. In conclusion, there is some evidence to prove the positive effects of nuclear

weapons

on the Globe like its deterrent influence on governments to start a

war

. It is imperative for all governments to prepare themselves to have nuclear

weapons

in order to have a peaceful

world

.