Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Nowadays many people suggest that

museums

art

Correct word choice

and art

show examples

galleries will no longer be required as we can see them through laptops and the internet.I completely disagree with the above statement as there is a big difference between seeing virtually and on campus

moreover

these are sources of royalty for the government and artists.

hence

it would be way better if people go for physically

then

Correct your spelling

than

show examples

virtually.

To begin

,it is important to consider how we see

things

virtually and physically.

This

is to say that seeing

things

naturally is way better than viewing them on the internet or on computers because we have more sense of seeing them beautifully than we can see them on the computer.For ,instance watching

things

on a laptop has no personal touch while seeing them originally or physically has an attraction to it. Another reason is that it is a good source of income for the government as well as artists.

This

is to say that

museums

are part of tourist attraction while

art

galleries are a good income source for artists .

furthermore

it

also

helps in the improvement of country's economy.For ,example according to , a survey we have seen that

museums

and

art

galleries have played a good role in contributing to the development of each and every country . In conclusion,it is good to say that

museums

and

art

gallery should not only be viewed virtually seeing them physically have more benefits as one can view original

things

in a better way as well as it

also

contributes to national and personal income