Governemnts should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.

Nowadays, we can travel to another place in several ways,

for example

, going by car on the

road

or about to the station to take a train. Some

people

said that

governments

ought to spend

money

on

railways

more than

roads

Change preposition

on roads

show examples

. In my opinion, I fully disagree with

this

idea because of the purpose of the

road

and the budget. Undeniably, the number of

road

users always

is

Unnecessary verb

apply

show examples

increased. Not only car users, but

also

walkers are increased.

In other words

,

roads

are more multipurpose than

railways

.

For instance

, in Thailand,

governments

tried to invest in trains more than

roads

.

However

, Thai

roads

have many problems

such

as fragile

roads

, the consequence is vicious travel on the

road

.

For example

,

people

can arrive at another place by walking faster than by car .

Thus

,

governments

should spend

money

on

roads

more than on

railways

.

In contrast

,

railways

are able to improve congestion problems on

roads

because

people

are turning to use

railways

increasingly.

However

, the railway cost is more expensive than the

road

cost. It would be conspicuous consumption that leads to the monetary problem.

For example

, in Thailand,

governments

were spending

money

on

railways

too much. The consequence is that trains

was

Change the verb form

were

show examples

barely improved.

Thus

, the government ought to plan about spending the monetary government carefully when they are thinking to invest in

railways

. To conclude,

roads

are more important than

railways

because of the

road

's purpose. The cost, which is used for

railways

, is expensive.

That is

the reason why I fully disagree with

people

saying that

governments

should spend

money

on

railways

instead

of

roads

.