In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

It is often said that there should be huge funding for the construction of new railway lines for having high-speed
trains
all over the cities.
On the contrary
, some
people
believe that
this
money
has to be spent in terms of the development of current public
transport
.
This
author's perspective is that investing
money
in the available public
transport
could be more reasonable, and in the following essay, both views are about to be debated as well. On the one hand, huge investments in establishing new railway lines could have various advantages.
Firstly
, by the establishment of these railways,
people
could be fortunate enough to commute to work or home by high-speed
trains
.
As a result
, less time would be spent on travelling between places which is an exquisite advantage compared to regular public
transport
.
Secondly
, it could result in a remarkable reduction in the volume of traffic.
Moreover
,
this
means less pollution in the air and emission gasses which would have a positive impact on these countries' environment.
For instance
, Japan established the fastest train called the "bullet train" in Tokyo in 2010.
Consequently
, the city become less crowded and healthier since
people
tended to travel by insanely fast train.
On the other hand
, it is more realistic to spend that
money
on the current public
transport
. The reason is that many
people
have adapted to
this
transportation system, and it would be more convenient for them to help make their conditions better by purchasing
money
in
this
area.
For example
,
although
the US has developed many accelerated
trains
, most
people
prefer to take the bus or subway
instead
according to national investigations. Another reason is that, by improving the available public
transport
, the countries' public transportation system would be developed much faster since not only less time would be spent on building structures but
also
the improvement procedure would be accelerated as a consequence.
Therefore
, it is reasonable enough to put investments in
this
area. In conclusion, it is often argued that large funding has to be contributed to the establishment of new railway lines for having fast
trains
or if it is better to spend
money
on the development of current public
transport
. It seems that it is wiser to spend
this
money
on the available public
transport
since
people
still prefer them.
Also
, it is a quicker way to improve the state of current
transport
.
Submitted by nazi.tbt on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Essentional vocabulary list for IELTS Writing 7+

Learn how to write high-scoring essays with powerful words.
Download Free PDF and start improving you writing skills today!
Topic Vocabulary:
  • infrastructure
  • efficient
  • congestion
  • sustainable
  • environmentally friendly
  • connectivity
  • economic growth
  • public transportation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: