In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is often said that there should be huge funding for the construction of new railway lines for having high-speed
trains
all over the cities. On the contrary
, some people
believe that this
money
has to be spent in terms of the development of current public transport
. This
author's perspective is that investing money
in the available public transport
could be more reasonable, and in the following essay, both views are about to be debated as well.
On the one hand, huge investments in establishing new railway lines could have various advantages. Firstly
, by the establishment of these railways, people
could be fortunate enough to commute to work or home by high-speed trains
. As a result
, less time would be spent on travelling between places which is an exquisite advantage compared to regular public transport
. Secondly
, it could result in a remarkable reduction in the volume of traffic. Moreover
, this
means less pollution in the air and emission gasses which would have a positive impact on these countries' environment. For instance
, Japan established the fastest train called the "bullet train" in Tokyo in 2010. Consequently
, the city become less crowded and healthier since people
tended to travel by insanely fast train.
On the other hand
, it is more realistic to spend that money
on the current public transport
. The reason is that many people
have adapted to this
transportation system, and it would be more convenient for them to help make their conditions better by purchasing money
in this
area. For example
, although
the US has developed many accelerated trains
, most people
prefer to take the bus or subway instead
according to national investigations. Another reason is that, by improving the available public transport
, the countries' public transportation system would be developed much faster since not only less time would be spent on building structures but also
the improvement procedure would be accelerated as a consequence. Therefore
, it is reasonable enough to put investments in this
area.
In conclusion, it is often argued that large funding has to be contributed to the establishment of new railway lines for having fast trains
or if it is better to spend money
on the development of current public transport
. It seems that it is wiser to spend this
money
on the available public transport
since people
still prefer them. Also
, it is a quicker way to improve the state of current transport
.Submitted by nazi.tbt on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?