Some experts believe that it's better to begin learning a foreigh language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?

In today's modern world, learning a foreign language has become very important. Some specialists believe that it should be implemented in primary school

instead

of secondary. I would like to discuss both aspects of

this

and give my opinion on

this

. Learning a foreign language has become a necessity for every individual.

To begin

with, the initial

stage

of learning is considered to be the right

stage

since the child grasps knowledge very quickly.

Secondly

, it

also

provides enough time to learn, develop and gain real practical experience.

Moreover

,

children

who tend to learn at the earliest age have been proven experts in various

languages

.

For example

, India is a diverse country and

children

are taught various

languages

in school at the primary level, and

this

has resulted in knowing, understanding and being fluent in various

languages

.

Nevertheless

, it is

also

true that learning in the primary

stage

causes more pressure as compared to learning in secondary schools,

this

is mainly because

children

are not fully developed and they are pressurized to learn various subjects.

Moreover

, if language learning is considered at the secondary level, it enables

children

to choose from a variety of

languages

depending on their interests and not on their parent's opinion but the fact that many students opt out during the process of learning is

also

a serious problem, especially faced by today's young generation. To sum up, I would like to conclude that the advantages of studying at the initial level outweigh the disadvantages. Pupils should be taught

a foreign

Correct the article-noun agreement

foreign languages

a foreign language

show examples

languages

at an earlier

stage

so that they become fluent, gain a wide knowledge of other cultures and gain real experience.